Lawsuit Loans – Use Only if You Absolutely Have To

In my law practice, I have always advised clients not to obtain a “lawsuit loan” unless they have absolutely no financial alternative. For those not familiar with the concept, there are companies which will loan plaintiffs money against an anticipated settlement or judgment. The good thing about these loans is that should you lose your lawsuit, you do not have to repay the loan (at least this is the case with all the companies with which I am familiar). The bad news is that you will be charged an extremely high interest rate for this loan. I’m talking “worse than credit card cash advance” interest rates.

Why Would Someone Take Out a Lawsuit Loan?

Personal injury plaintiffs often miss work, and sometimes lose their jobs entirely, due to their injuries. Their bills don’t stop coming just because they’re hurt. And let’s face it — lawsuits can take a long time to resolve, sometimes years. When a plaintiff has exhausted all other means of borrowing, a lawsuit loan may be the only way to pay his mortgage/rent or put food on the table. If this is your circumstance, then a lawsuit loan may be your only option. On the other hand, if you are merely impatient or you want some money for Christmas or birthday presents, you would be a fool to take out a loan at such a high interest rate. Your short-term pleasure will be more than offset by your long-term pain when the time to repay the loan comes around.

Your Lawyer Will Not Be Happy

Aside from a lawyer’s general misgivings about the wisdom of a client taking out a lawsuit loan, he will be unhappy for another reason: the companies that issue these loans require lawyers to fill out a bunch of forms and provide supporting documentation about your case before they will consider lending you money. Basically, you just made a lot of extra work for your lawyer — and this extra work is to help you do something he already considers to be a bad idea.

While you may consider the handling of this loan paperwork to be part of your lawyer’s job, he most certainly will not. His job is to extract as much compensation from the defendant that hurt you as possible. Helping you with a loan application is going above and beyond. More work for no extra pay doesn’t make any lawyer happy.

Settlement tip

If your lawyer has never dealt with one of these types of loans before (these are not routine) there will be ethical questions he will need to research before filling out the loan paperwork. These companies don’t care if they have questions on their forms which would violate legal ethics to answer. Be patient if your attorney can’t turn around the paperwork in a day.

Ask a Lawyer Online.  Get an Answer ASAP.

Keep in Mind that the Loan Money You Get Now Will Reduce What You Get From Your Settlement Later

It may seem obvious to point this out, but many clients who take out these loans seem to discount them when it comes time to settle their case. This is probably because the loan money is long gone months before a good settlement offer comes in. Plaintiffs tend to have a dollar amount in mind as to their final “take” on a lawsuit, and it is all to common for that number to remain unchanged even after a loan is taken out.

This is another reason lawyers don’t like dealing with these kinds of loans. They make cases harder to settle. Now, in addition to your attorney’s fees, costs, and medical bills being deducted from your gross settlement, you have a loan plus interest to deduct as well. Some plaintiffs will try to offset their loan expense by holding out for an unreasonably high settlement offer. Don’t be one of those people. Realize that you got paid in part a while ago (through your loan) and adjust your expectations for recovery downwards accordingly.

Who to Use for Your Lawsuit Loan?

Before I make my recommendation, know that I have absolutely no affiliation with any lawsuit loan company and I make no money from referring you to any particular one of them (some of these companies may appear in the Google ads on my site, but I don’t pick them — Google does). Go with whoever offers you the best deal. That being said, I would use Peachtree. In my experience, they have the lowest rates for this type of loan (mind you, these are not low rates) and are fairly painless to work with as a lawyer. I would definitely include them in a short list of lenders if you want to shop around.

Parting Advice About Lawsuit Loans

If you absolutely need a lawsuit loan, only borrow as much as you need. The lender may offer more, but resist that temptation. You can always go back to them and ask for more if you need it later. I had one client who took out three consecutive loans in a case involving multiple defendants who were all dragging the case out.

Keep in mind that given the current economy, your loan application may be denied. This is not necessarily a reflection on how strong or weak your case is. Some lenders are wary of lending money unless the defendant in your case is insured by an A+ rated insurance company. Even if your defendant is a self-insured Fortune 500 company, you can get denied because the lender’s underwriting guidelines require an A+ rating, which self-insurers won’t have. Your lawyer’s opinion as to the merits of your case is much more important than a lender’s.

This entry was posted in General and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Lawsuit Loans – Use Only if You Absolutely Have To

  1. mike says:

    if i have already received a lawsuit loan , can i sue because i felt they over charged me?

    • fl_litig8r says:

      If the loan company violated the written agreement by charging you more than the contract provides, it is a possibility (though it may not be worth enough for a lawyer to want to take the case). If they charged the amount the contract specified and you just think that it too much, you likely can’t sue, due to the gutting of most state usury laws during the Reagan years.

  2. disabledfool says:

    I fired my first lawyer after he did partial discovery in my case because he assumed the case would settle. He did no deposition, He did not get the survellience video. The Walmart attorneys where just buying time for discovery to run out. I had no idea my case was in discovery mode and scrambled for another attorney. Its hard to find another attorney. I have serious long lasting injuries. Most attorneys are saying the cost to fight the case with expert to trial run $40,000. I was wandering if I could do a fundraiser telling my story and that I was injured at Walmart without the core details. Can I mention where I was hurt.

    • fl_litig8r says:

      I’m not sure how well a fundraiser to pay for a personal injury suit’s costs would go over, and what you would do if you win — will you pay the donors back if your costs are reimbursed by Walmart? I’ve just never seen this type of thing being done, and I doubt it will work, but I never thought someone could raise any money on Kickstarter for making potato salad either.

      If you want to tell your story, I don’t see a lot of risk in it. There’s always the chance (albeit small) that Walmart could sue you for libel if you name them in a public statement about your case, but to win that case it would need to prove that your story is false. If you’ve already filed a lawsuit describing the facts of how you got injured, I can’t really see Walmart doing anything if you repeat this information as part of a fundraiser. The facts are already in the public record.

      With respect to firing your lawyer, it’s a hard lesson for clients to learn, but finding a lawyer to take over a case from another is very difficult. You really need to think long and hard before firing a lawyer, because, as you discovered, you may be left with no representation at all. Even a bad lawyer is usually better than no lawyer.

      If your case is as strong as you say, I’m surprised you haven’t been able to find a lawyer who would be willing to front the costs out of pocket and just deduct those from any settlement or judgment. Many, if not most, personal injury lawyers do this, even on expensive cases. It could be that they are not as confident as you are that you’d win in front of a jury, and because they know that Walmart has a reputation for not settling even the good cases, they are only willing to risk their time, and not their own money, representing you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>